HOME ◼︎ CHILDREN ◼︎ STUDY GUIDES ◼︎ BOOK REFLECTIONS ◼︎ LEARNING STORIES ◼︎ TOPICS ◼︎ ESSAYS ◼︎ LINKS◼︎ SPACES◼︎ FOREST SCHOOL RESOURCES ◼︎ WRITING
Book Reflection
BOOK I and Thou
by Martin Buber
The Sacred Space Between
Martin Buber’s I and Thou is not a philosophy in the conventional sense. It reads more like a spiritual topology—mapping not what is, but how we are in relation. Published in 1923 and translated from the German Ich und Du, the book opens a radical vision of existence, one that pivots not on isolated identity but on the quality of relationship. Buber calls us to shift from an “I–It” orientation, in which we treat the world and others as objects to be used or observed, to an “I–Thou” relation, in which we meet the world and others as whole beings, sacred and ungraspable.
To live in the mode of “I–Thou” is not a permanent state, but a sacred encounter—fleeting, transformative, and profoundly real. In Buber’s words: “All real living is meeting.”
I–It and I–Thou: Two Modes of Being
At the heart of Buber’s book is a binary structure: the world presents itself to us in two fundamental ways.
- I–It is the world of experience, utility, and separation. It is analytical, functional, and often necessary. When I study a tree, categorize a feeling, or use a tool, I am in I–It relation.
- I–Thou is the world of presence and relation. It is immediate, whole, and direct. When I meet another person in full presence—or encounter a tree not as an object but as a living presence—I am in I–Thou.
These are not types of relationships but stances toward existence. What makes Buber’s philosophy radical is his insistence that our relation to others is our relation to God. Not as a third being, but as what Buber calls the “eternal Thou.” When we truly meet a human being—or any being—with reverence and presence, we stand in relation to the divine.
This is a theocentric humanism. “In the Thou,” Buber writes, “we address the eternal Thou.”
Language, Dialogue, and the Cradle of the Sacred
Buber’s background in storytelling and Hasidic tradition brings a grounded, almost poetic quality to his writing. The sacred, for him, isn’t something distant or abstract—it’s something that can shine through in the moments we truly meet another person. But he isn’t talking about conversation. “Dialogue,” in Buber’s sense, means a kind of presence—turning toward another without agenda, without trying to define or use them. It’s a stance of openness. There are similarities here with later thinkers like Levinas, who emphasized seeing the other as a full, irreducible being—not a problem to solve, but a presence that asks something of us.
In the classroom, the family, the world of care and work—how often do we operate in I–It, even with good intentions? We categorize children, plan their development, shape them into outcomes. We do the same to ourselves. I and Thou dares us to ask: What happens if I meet this child, this tree, this moment as Thou?
Comparison with Early Buddhist Thought
It might seem, at first glance, that Buber’s I–Thou philosophy and early Buddhist thought diverge entirely. Buddhism is famously wary of a permanent self or soul (atta), and Buber’s language of “I” and “Thou” seems to presuppose distinct, sacred subjects.
But the real resonance lies beneath the grammar.
In early Buddhist texts, relational presence is central, though articulated through different ontological assumptions. The Buddha’s teaching on anattā (non-self) is not a denial of relation, but a call to release the illusion of fixed identity. This aligns with Buber’s insistence that “I” only truly exists in the act of relation. “The I of the primary word I–Thou is a different I from that of the primary word I–It,” Buber writes. The self is not a substance, but a movement—a stance toward the world.
Both frameworks see liberation in the letting-go of grasping. In the I–It world, I grasp, control, use. In the world of craving (taṇhā), I cling to forms and outcomes. In contrast, the I–Thou relation and the path of sammā-diṭṭhi (right view) both require radical receptivity. The Karuṇā (compassion) of early Buddhism and Buber’s Thou-relation both refuse to instrumentalize the other.
Yet key tensions remain. Buber insists on the irreducibility of encounter—each “Thou” is a sacred presence. Buddhism, by contrast, might say that the “Thou” is a convention, a useful designation (paññatti) resting on impersonal processes (saṅkhāra). Where Buber finds God, the early Buddhists find conditionality.
But perhaps both traditions are pointing toward the same moral vision: a world in which beings are not treated as things.
Presence as Practice
I and Thou is not a guidebook. It offers no techniques, no prescriptions, no system. Its power lies in its provocation. It names a truth we all know in the marrow of our lives: that there are moments of meeting so full, so real, they undo the machinery of the world. These moments do not last. But they orient us.
In a society ruled by metrics, outcomes, and optimization, Buber’s vision is subversive. In the early childhood classroom, it demands that we stop assessing and start listening. In parenting, it asks that we drop our tools of control and simply be with the child. In contemplative life, it is a call to inhabit the present not as an object of awareness, but as Thou—whole, alive, and unrepeatable.
Glossary: Key Terms in “I and Thou” and Buddhist Dialogue (in my loose interpretation)
I–It
A stance of separation. The other is an object to be used, studied, or categorized. This mode is common in functional, instrumental, and analytical ways of relating. It dominates most institutional, educational, and daily systems of thought and interaction.
I–Thou
A stance of relation and reverence. The other is encountered as a whole presence, not reduced to categories or roles. It is not about sentimentality but about mutual presence and immediacy. In this mode, one meets the other beyond utility.
Thou
Not just a person, but any being, moment, or presence that is met fully. For Buber, this includes human beings, trees, animals, and even God. The Thou is not an object; it is relational and sacred.
The Eternal Thou
Buber’s term for the divine. God is not a distant being but is encountered in every true I–Thou relation. The Eternal Thou is ever-present but never graspable. When we meet another being deeply, we are in relation with God.
Dialogue (Buber’s Sense)
Not mere conversation. Dialogue is a turning toward the other with openness and presence. It may be silent. It is an existential orientation, not a verbal exchange. It reflects a way of being-with, not talking-to.
Mystical Realism
A phrase to describe Buber’s worldview: the sacred is not abstract or otherworldly but appears in the real, the relational, the now. Rooted in his Jewish and Hasidic traditions, it is a spirituality grounded in everyday presence.
Hasidism
A Jewish spiritual movement that deeply influenced Buber. Hasidic tales often emphasize direct experience of the divine in ordinary life, valuing joy, relation, and devotion. For Buber, these stories expressed a lived I–Thou spirituality.
Ethics of the Face (Levinas)
A philosophy that aligns with Buber’s I–Thou: the face of the other calls us into ethical responsibility. It is an irreducible presence that cannot be used or known, only responded to. Buber prefigures this in his emphasis on presence.
Theocentric Humanism
A phrase describing Buber’s vision: human relationships are the place where the divine is met. God is not above the human but in the human encounter. This differs from secular humanism but avoids authoritarian theology.
Ontological Stance
An orientation toward being. Buber’s two modes are not behaviors, but ways of being-in-the-world. Early Buddhism also teaches stances (e.g., clinging vs. non-clinging, craving vs. wisdom), though without fixed metaphysical selves.
Anattā (Non-Self)
A key Buddhist doctrine: there is no unchanging, independent self. This does not negate relation but opens the way for non-grasping, fluid engagement with others and with reality. Parallels Buber’s “I” as emerging only in relation.
Sammā-Diṭṭhi (Right View)
The first factor of the Noble Eightfold Path. It refers to seeing things as they truly are, without distortion. In this context, it parallels I–Thou as a clear, receptive way of meeting others and the world.
Taṇhā (Craving)
Grasping or clinging to experiences, people, outcomes. Craving creates suffering. In Buddhist thought, taṇhā is the driver of I–It mode—treating others as sources of pleasure, gain, or control.
Karuṇā (Compassion)
A deep, non-clinging compassion central to early Buddhist ethics. It resonates with Buber’s Thou-relation: both are rooted in attending to the other without using them. Karuṇā does not objectify, fix, or rescue—it meets.
Paññatti (Designation)
A concept in Buddhist thought: names and identities are conventional designations, not ultimate realities. This challenges Buber’s sacralization of the “Thou,” but not necessarily its ethical import.
Saṅkhāra (Formations / Conditioned Processes)
The constructed patterns and mental formations that make up what we call a “self” or “person.” In Buddhism, beings are processes, not substances—echoing Buber’s idea of the “I” as arising in relation.
Conditionality (Paṭicca Samuppāda)
The Buddhist principle that all things arise due to causes and conditions. Nothing stands alone. While Buber emphasizes sacred presence, Buddhism highlights interdependence—both are concerned with relation.
Presence
A central but layered term. For Buber, presence is full, immediate relation. For Buddhism, presence means non-grasping, awareness, and attunement to arising phenomena. Both traditions value presence over possession.
Spiritual Instrumentalization
The subtle habit of turning relationships, practices, or beings into tools for achievement or self-improvement. Both Buber and early Buddhist texts challenge this, insisting on presence without agenda.
Relational Dharma
A term used in the final question—not from canonical texts but a useful synthesis. It points to the integration of Buddhist practice and relational presence. Not a doctrinal category, but a modern insight into practicing with others.
Related Resources
- Buddhist Parallel: The Way of the Bodhisattva by Śāntideva (esp. on compassion without clinging)
- Comparative Philosophy: Totality and Infinity by Emmanuel Levinas
- Hasidic Influence: Tales of the Hasidim by Martin Buber
- Education Lens: The Courage to Teach by Parker Palmer
- Contemplative Life: The Miracle of Mindfulness by Thich Nhat Hanh
Key Takeaways and Next Steps
What You Can Do Now
- Pause before speaking. Turn your attention toward the person, not just their words.
- Let a moment with a child, partner, or tree remain ungrasped—don’t name it, just meet it.
Longer-Term Shifts to Consider
- Reflect on how often your relationships fall into the I–It mode—especially in care roles.
- Shift your language and awareness from “fixing” or “guiding” to encountering.
- Reconsider what it means to relate to the sacred: not through dogma, but through presence.
Questions to Live With
- When do I meet others as Thou? What allows that to happen?
- What in me resists the vulnerability of I–Thou relationship?
- How do my spiritual practices cultivate or obscure presence?
Challenge Your Assumptions
- What if your deepest spiritual transformation does not come in solitude, but in your way of being with others? Relational Dharma?
Related Articles
A beginner-friendly introduction to Buddhism. This essay offers a clear, exploration of what Buddhism is—and what it isn’t—through the life of the Buddha, the Four Noble Truths, and the path of practice. No jargon, no mysticism—just a human invitation to clarity, freedom, and direct experience.
A poetic and provocative invitation into the sacred realm of human presence, I and Thou offers a relational metaphysics that challenges modern habits of detachment and objectification.
When attention softens, the forest responds. Birds, breath, and baseline become a mirror—not of self, but of tone, pressure, and the wake of thought.
A deeper look at sammāsati, the Buddha’s Right Mindfulness—rooted in ethics, memory, and wisdom, not just presence. A critique of secular mindfulness and a return to path.
Exploring presence as relational, embodied, ethical, and cross-cultural—moving from technique to undoing, attunement, and mutual vulnerability with children and nature.
In the hush of the forest classroom, Emily discovered withered mushrooms and responded not with removal, but with reverence—sculpting clay companions to ease their solitude.
An invitation for teachers to reclaim their inner life, Parker Palmer offers a pedagogy of presence grounded in authenticity, integrity, and the soul of the educator.
A quiet moment of a child reading to a sapling becomes a meditation on empathy, presence, and the unseen curriculum of relational, child-led learning in nature.
Related Resources
Would Love to Hear From You!
Related Writing
Topics