The Story of Forest Schools: From Danish Walks to Global Movement
Imagine this: it's 1952 in Denmark, and a woman named Ella Flautau has a problem that many parents today would recognize all too well. She needs someone to watch her kids during the day, but traditional childcare options are either too expensive or simply don't exist in her rural community. So she does what any resourceful parent might do – she starts taking her children, along with some neighborhood kids, on long walks through the nearby forests every single day.
What Ella probably didn't realize at the time was that her practical solution to a childcare shortage would eventually spark a global educational revolution. Today, tens of thousands of children around the world attend "forest schools" – programs that trace their roots directly back to those simple Danish forest walks more than seventy years ago.
The Danish Beginning: When Necessity Met Nature
To understand why forest schools started in Denmark, you need to picture post-war Scandinavia in the 1950s. Traditional family structures were changing as more women entered the workforce, but formal childcare systems hadn't caught up yet. Meanwhile, Scandinavian culture had always embraced something called "friluftsliv" – literally "free air life" – which is the belief that spending time outdoors is essential for physical and mental health.
Ella Flautau's forest walks weren't revolutionary because they were new, but because they formalized something that Scandinavian families had always known: children thrive when they're outside. Think of it like this – while other countries were building more indoor classrooms and playgrounds, Denmark was asking "What if the forest itself could be the classroom?"
The timing was perfect. The 1970s energy crisis had made people more environmentally conscious, and child development experts were beginning to question whether traditional classroom-based education was really the best way for young children to learn. Ella's simple idea of daily forest exploration started to look less like casual childcare and more like educational innovation.
Sweden Adds the Magic: Stories, Songs, and Structure
While Denmark gave birth to the forest school concept, Sweden transformed it into something truly special. In 1957, a man named Gösta Frohm created what he called "Skogsmulle" – a program that used fictional woodland characters to teach children about nature through songs, stories, and hands-on activities.
Picture children gathering around a leader who might suddenly introduce them to "Mulle," a friendly forest gnome who lives under the roots of old trees, or "Sjöröke," a water sprite who teaches them about lakes and streams. Frohm understood something crucial about how children learn: they don't just absorb facts, they create emotional connections to ideas through stories and imagination.
But here's where it gets really interesting. A educator named Siw Linde took Frohm's creative approach and turned it into the first formal "I Ur och Skur" (Rain or Shine) nursery school in 1985. This wasn't just outdoor play time – it was a complete educational philosophy that said children could learn everything they needed to know through direct experience with nature, regardless of weather conditions.
The "rain or shine" principle became central to forest school philosophy. While conventional schools might cancel outdoor activities because of bad weather, forest schools embrace the idea that there's no such thing as bad weather, only inappropriate clothing. This might seem like a small detail, but it represents a fundamental shift in thinking about children's capabilities and resilience.
The Philosophy Takes Shape: What Makes Forest Schools Different
As forest schools spread from Denmark and Sweden to other countries, educators began to articulate what made this approach unique. Unlike traditional education, which typically starts with predetermined curriculum goals and works toward them, forest schools flip this process entirely upside down.
Imagine a typical preschool classroom where children rotate through scheduled activities – circle time, art project, snack time, outdoor play. Now imagine instead that children arrive at a forest and simply begin exploring whatever captures their interest. One child might spend an entire morning building a shelter from fallen branches, another might collect different types of leaves, and a third might observe insects under a log. The adult's role isn't to direct these activities but to follow the children's lead and help them deepen their investigations.
This approach, called "child-led learning," sounds simple but represents a radical trust in children's natural curiosity and learning instincts. Forest school educators believe that when children are given freedom to explore their own interests in rich natural environments, they naturally develop all the skills they need – problem-solving, creativity, social cooperation, physical coordination, and even early academic concepts like counting and classification.
The philosophy also embraces something that makes many modern parents nervous: risk. Forest school children use real tools like saws and knives, climb trees, and navigate uneven terrain. But this isn't reckless endangerment – it's "supported risk-taking" where children learn to assess and manage risks themselves, developing judgment and confidence that serves them throughout their lives.
Crossing Borders: How Forest Schools Went Global
The spread of forest schools from Scandinavia to the rest of the world tells a fascinating story about how educational ideas travel and adapt to different cultures. Think of it like a successful recipe that gets modified as it moves from kitchen to kitchen – the basic ingredients stay the same, but each cook adds their own local flavors.
Germany became the first major adopter outside of Scandinavia, officially recognizing state-supported forest schools in the early 1990s. The German model typically combines outdoor mornings with indoor afternoons, adapting to local educational requirements while maintaining core forest school principles.
The United Kingdom took a different approach, developing comprehensive professional training systems. British educators created formal qualification standards and established the Forest School Association to ensure quality and consistency. The movement has experienced remarkable growth since arriving in the UK in the 1990s.
North America's embrace of forest schools reflects the continent's own outdoor education traditions. Forest schools have grown particularly strong in states like California, Washington, and Vermont, where programs often blend forest school principles with existing outdoor education philosophies like environmental education and adventure learning.
Perhaps most interesting is how forest schools have adapted to completely different climates and landscapes. Australia developed "bush kindergartens" that incorporate Aboriginal perspectives on land connection. Coastal areas created "beach schools" that use shoreline environments. Desert regions adapted the philosophy to work with different seasonal patterns and natural challenges.
What Makes Forest Schools Special?
As forest schools spread globally, educators and parents began noticing something interesting about children who attended these programs. Forest school children seemed to develop certain qualities that were harder to cultivate in traditional classroom settings.
Children who spent their days exploring forests and natural spaces often showed remarkable confidence when facing new challenges. They became comfortable with uncertainty and problem-solving because every day in nature presented new puzzles to solve. A fallen tree might become a bridge one day and a balance beam the next, teaching children to adapt and think creatively about their environment.
These children also developed strong collaborative skills, partly because outdoor environments naturally encourage cooperation. When you're building a fort or exploring a creek with friends, you learn to negotiate, share ideas, and work together toward common goals. The absence of predetermined activities means children must create their own games and adventures, fostering leadership skills and social creativity.
Perhaps most notably, forest school children seemed to maintain what educators call "intrinsic motivation" – the natural love of learning that many children lose as they progress through traditional school systems. When learning emerges from genuine curiosity rather than external requirements, children often carry that enthusiasm for discovery throughout their lives.
Modern Challenges: Growing Pains of a Global Movement
Today's forest schools face challenges that reflect their success as much as their limitations. Rapid growth has created quality control concerns – not every program calling itself a "forest school" necessarily follows the core principles that make the approach effective. This has led to efforts to establish clearer standards and training requirements.
Regulatory challenges present another significant hurdle. Most forest schools can't obtain traditional childcare licenses because they lack permanent indoor facilities. Only a few states like Washington have developed specific outdoor preschool licensing, leaving many programs operating in regulatory gray areas that create uncertainty for families and providers.
Cost remains perhaps the biggest barrier to broader adoption. Forest schools typically require higher adult-to-child ratios for safety, specialized equipment, and transportation to natural sites. These factors often result in higher tuition costs, making forest schools accessible primarily to affluent families.
Safety concerns also generate ongoing debates. While forest school advocates argue that supported risk-taking builds children's judgment and resilience, critics worry about liability issues and parental comfort levels. Balancing authentic outdoor experiences with modern safety expectations requires constant negotiation.
Looking Forward: The Future of Learning Outdoors
The COVID-19 pandemic unexpectedly accelerated interest in forest schools as parents and educators sought safer outdoor learning environments. Many programs reported increases in enrollment as families reconsidered the value of outdoor education for both health and learning benefits.
This growth comes at a time when traditional education systems face mounting challenges: increasing rates of childhood anxiety and depression, concerns about screen time and sedentary lifestyles, and growing awareness of the need for environmental education to address climate change. Forest schools offer potential solutions to all these concerns, positioning them as increasingly relevant rather than merely alternative.
The movement's future likely depends on addressing its current limitations while preserving its core strengths. This means developing more accessible funding models, creating clearer regulatory frameworks, building stronger research evidence, and maintaining quality standards as programs multiply.
Perhaps most importantly, the forest school movement continues to ask fundamental questions about what children really need to thrive and learn. In an age of increasing digitization and urbanization, the simple idea that children learn best through direct experience with the natural world feels both ancient and revolutionary.
Conclusion: More Than Just Playing in the Woods
The story of forest schools reveals how a simple Danish solution to childcare shortage evolved into a global movement that challenges basic assumptions about education. What started with Ella Flautau taking neighborhood children on forest walks has grown into a comprehensive educational philosophy that serves children worldwide.
The enduring appeal of forest schools lies not just in their outdoor setting, but in their fundamental respect for children's natural learning instincts. By trusting children to direct their own learning in rich natural environments, forest schools tap into something that traditional classroom education often struggles to achieve: genuine enthusiasm for discovery and learning.
Whether forest schools represent the future of early childhood education or simply one valuable option among many remains to be seen. What's clear is that they've permanently changed conversations about how and where children learn best. In a world increasingly concerned about children's mental health, environmental awareness, and authentic learning experiences, those Danish forest walks from 1952 continue to offer important insights about what children truly need to thrive.
The story isn't finished yet. As forest schools continue to spread and evolve, they're writing new chapters in the ongoing human quest to understand how children learn and grow. And at its heart, that story remains beautifully simple: sometimes the best classroom is no classroom at all, just children, caring adults, and the endless learning opportunities that nature provides.
Related Articles
A simple forest school lesson on bird alarms became a doorway into presence, perception, and pressure—spanning science, parenting, deep nature connection, and contemplative awareness.